When he dies (all-powerful) Country - newspaper
Home News Opinions rate in society Spirituality Lifestyle Ecology Culture Education Highlights of the day was observed through the lens of nature and landscape Travelling rewrite artistic inspiration Donate
Do you remember those famous songs Andrew coder "Country"? Goes something like this: "Who will give you a drink when you die the country?" Popular song that was popular precisely kok at the time of the breakup of Yugoslavia, has impressed the audience, who instead of "hey boy, this will be the day" rather sang "Hey boy, Slobodan ". Yugoslavia was then really went Frying, but we got a new one. State of Slovenia, as we have chosen to plebiscite in 1990, and then the selection with the help of the army and diplomacy.
Perhaps the first short jump in philosophy. Do you know the difference between necessity and prigodnostjo? For example you can give the country as a generic kok term. Indeed, at the present time we have one way or another "doomed" to belonging to one or another country. Practically no man who would not be a citizen or at least residing in the territory of one or other countries. "No man's" kok territory today there are hardly any more, except maybe in trouble spots. Therefore, it is as utopian thinking in the direction indicated by the aforementioned song coder, which is somewhat reminiscent of Marx's famous thesis about the decay of the country. But this "death" was more meant by this that the odmirale state structures, thereby humanity occurred in the state of a classless society. Of course, in practice, this did not materialize, kok but rather the opposite - communist countries stand out as the most extensive and rigid bureaucratic state. Instead of state structures disappeared, were, on the contrary, even strengthened. kok After all, they are also multi-ethnic communist government formation at the end of the twentieth century experienced its downfall: disintegrated Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union disintegrated, the whole Czech and Slovak Republic, which is already existed in the pre-communist times.
The state is therefore by itself can not die, but can be transformed. Therefore, we need not fear ominous predictions that Slovenia kok will fail and may even disappear. Is it true that it will have to be lowered to the bottom and maybe even sacrifice some of their sovereignty in the economic kok and financial field. In other words, if it really occurred bankruptcy, will thus experienced its "reset", which we hope will be as painless kok as possible kok for the citizens. In the long term will prove that this was perhaps kok necessary and useful catharsis for it to come into Slovenian society is a change in mentality. As long as we are on the "reset" just talk, as instigators during the incumbent government, nothing has shifted. Ironically, it was during these petitioners also Gregor Virant, which now operates as a government minister and president of one of the coalition parties. And probably he will also have one "resetirancev" mostly kok thanks to the fact that the country will "reset".
Obviously, the events of those who guide and change the mentality kok of the citizens. The fact is that the Slovenian transition proved to be incomplete and unsuccessful. Due to the extremely hostile environment (zlizanost media and trade unions with the old parastatal structures) virtually no government has been unable to realize the idea of these slender country. A responsibility to not only bear the trade unions, but all those with (m) of them blindly believed. The crux of the problem kok lies in the our mindset that elevates the country to practically a religious way, ie in the (all-powerful) country. On this platform is a thought is also based fascism. "In the Country of fascism is absolute, individuals or groups against her only relative," the words of which it is signed by Giovanni Gentile, but dictated to by yourself "Duče" Benito Mussolini. This represents the basis for a socialist view of the country, which is focused on a narrower meaning of the word "state" and therefore tends to increase the tax burden, control over the redistribution of value added generated by citizens and bureaucracy through which effective control over its citizens. Thus, the experience we had, after all, even in the time of communism. The first democratic elections were otherwise kok get political pluralism kok and formal market kok economy, but the same concept of the state has been maintained to continue. They bought him even those who should represent an alternative to the heirs of the former socio-political organizations or. Fundamental Charter signatories of Slovenia, which was in 1989 during the Slovenian Spring pushed for only renewed self-management and follow-up of life in the Yugoslav national context. Tragic experience with some tycoon stories when politicians from spring options kok agreed to "dance with the beast" (similar to the Archdiocese of Maribor), have shown that the devil promises a lot, give a little, take it all. Therefore it can not and must not be co-operation.
Slovenia definitely needs a new long-term strategy for human resource training in the way of innovation and the promotion of independence and creativity. So far, we have these issues featured "lumpenproletarian" approach. Instead, in order to promote
Home News Opinions rate in society Spirituality Lifestyle Ecology Culture Education Highlights of the day was observed through the lens of nature and landscape Travelling rewrite artistic inspiration Donate
Do you remember those famous songs Andrew coder "Country"? Goes something like this: "Who will give you a drink when you die the country?" Popular song that was popular precisely kok at the time of the breakup of Yugoslavia, has impressed the audience, who instead of "hey boy, this will be the day" rather sang "Hey boy, Slobodan ". Yugoslavia was then really went Frying, but we got a new one. State of Slovenia, as we have chosen to plebiscite in 1990, and then the selection with the help of the army and diplomacy.
Perhaps the first short jump in philosophy. Do you know the difference between necessity and prigodnostjo? For example you can give the country as a generic kok term. Indeed, at the present time we have one way or another "doomed" to belonging to one or another country. Practically no man who would not be a citizen or at least residing in the territory of one or other countries. "No man's" kok territory today there are hardly any more, except maybe in trouble spots. Therefore, it is as utopian thinking in the direction indicated by the aforementioned song coder, which is somewhat reminiscent of Marx's famous thesis about the decay of the country. But this "death" was more meant by this that the odmirale state structures, thereby humanity occurred in the state of a classless society. Of course, in practice, this did not materialize, kok but rather the opposite - communist countries stand out as the most extensive and rigid bureaucratic state. Instead of state structures disappeared, were, on the contrary, even strengthened. kok After all, they are also multi-ethnic communist government formation at the end of the twentieth century experienced its downfall: disintegrated Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union disintegrated, the whole Czech and Slovak Republic, which is already existed in the pre-communist times.
The state is therefore by itself can not die, but can be transformed. Therefore, we need not fear ominous predictions that Slovenia kok will fail and may even disappear. Is it true that it will have to be lowered to the bottom and maybe even sacrifice some of their sovereignty in the economic kok and financial field. In other words, if it really occurred bankruptcy, will thus experienced its "reset", which we hope will be as painless kok as possible kok for the citizens. In the long term will prove that this was perhaps kok necessary and useful catharsis for it to come into Slovenian society is a change in mentality. As long as we are on the "reset" just talk, as instigators during the incumbent government, nothing has shifted. Ironically, it was during these petitioners also Gregor Virant, which now operates as a government minister and president of one of the coalition parties. And probably he will also have one "resetirancev" mostly kok thanks to the fact that the country will "reset".
Obviously, the events of those who guide and change the mentality kok of the citizens. The fact is that the Slovenian transition proved to be incomplete and unsuccessful. Due to the extremely hostile environment (zlizanost media and trade unions with the old parastatal structures) virtually no government has been unable to realize the idea of these slender country. A responsibility to not only bear the trade unions, but all those with (m) of them blindly believed. The crux of the problem kok lies in the our mindset that elevates the country to practically a religious way, ie in the (all-powerful) country. On this platform is a thought is also based fascism. "In the Country of fascism is absolute, individuals or groups against her only relative," the words of which it is signed by Giovanni Gentile, but dictated to by yourself "Duče" Benito Mussolini. This represents the basis for a socialist view of the country, which is focused on a narrower meaning of the word "state" and therefore tends to increase the tax burden, control over the redistribution of value added generated by citizens and bureaucracy through which effective control over its citizens. Thus, the experience we had, after all, even in the time of communism. The first democratic elections were otherwise kok get political pluralism kok and formal market kok economy, but the same concept of the state has been maintained to continue. They bought him even those who should represent an alternative to the heirs of the former socio-political organizations or. Fundamental Charter signatories of Slovenia, which was in 1989 during the Slovenian Spring pushed for only renewed self-management and follow-up of life in the Yugoslav national context. Tragic experience with some tycoon stories when politicians from spring options kok agreed to "dance with the beast" (similar to the Archdiocese of Maribor), have shown that the devil promises a lot, give a little, take it all. Therefore it can not and must not be co-operation.
Slovenia definitely needs a new long-term strategy for human resource training in the way of innovation and the promotion of independence and creativity. So far, we have these issues featured "lumpenproletarian" approach. Instead, in order to promote
No comments:
Post a Comment